2.5 billion
Lost to fraud in 2024, a record high according to the Federal Trade Commission.
Executive Summary
Identity and Fraud Insights for Merchants in 2026
Source: Experian 2025 Identity and Fraud Report, Merchant Edition
Consumers are spending more time online and losing confidence in the platforms meant to protect them. Payments companies have quietly cracked the trust problem. Most retailers have not. This summary covers what the data shows and what it means for merchants navigating fraud, checkout friction, and the loyalty of a generation that grew up online but still cannot spot a scam.
2.5 billion
Lost to fraud in 2024, a record high according to the Federal Trade Commission.
83%
Of consumers report some lifetime usage of P2P payment apps. Payment providers have been the most trusted digital category for five consecutive years.
43%
Of shoppers prefer guest checkout, and 72% of those still use it even when they already have an account.
95%
Of fraud victims experience emotional distress, including anxiety, shame, and depression, per the Identity Theft Resource Center.
Security and privacy beat convenience. Every year. No exceptions.
When consumers rank what matters most to their online experience, the results have been consistent for four consecutive years. Security and privacy dominate by a wide margin, followed by convenience and then personalization.
Who is earning trust, and who has the widest gap to cover?
When consumers rate their trust in specific businesses to address security and privacy concerns, the scores range from 14% to 25%. The expectation of protection, however, runs far higher for most categories. The gap between what consumers expect and what they believe they receive is where merchant vulnerability lives.
| Segment | Trust score | Protection importance | Gap | Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P2P Payment Apps | 28% | approximately 22% | +6% favorable | The only category where consumers trust the company more than they expect to need protection from it. |
| Payment System Providers | 25% | approximately 20% | +6% favorable | The only category where consumers trust the company more than they expect to need protection from it. |
| Ecommerce Marketplaces | 25% | approximately 25% | Neutral | Meeting expectations and the fifth-most-used category in the past six months. |
| Retail Banks | 24% | approximately 30% | Shortfall | High importance, moderate delivery. |
| Branded Retail Sites | 18% | above 30% | more than 30% | The widest trust gap in the entire study. Consumers ranked branded retailers second-highest in importance of protection, after government agencies, yet trust delivery is among the lowest. |
| Online Gaming Sites | 15% | approximately 30% | more than 30% | Significant consumer skepticism with similarly low trust delivery expectations. |
P2P apps rank first in enhancing the online experience. Retail apps rank second. The difference is trust delivery.
Consumers ranked 16 P2P payment apps as the single biggest contributor to a better online experience, cited by 58% of respondents. Retail apps followed closely at 56%. Yet when it comes to whether those retailers are actually protecting consumers, the gap opens wide.
Consumers are also willing to transact with an unfamiliar merchant when a recognized payment provider is present. This behavior has been consistent since 2022. The trust is not in the merchant. It is in the payment layer sitting between them.
Consumers want to be recognized. They do not want to re-register.
While 40% of consumers say they have opened a new account with a retailer in the past six months, the reality is more nuanced. Among 18 to 24-year-olds, 20% could not recall whether they had, a sign that onboarding is either so seamless it is forgettable or so optional it is being bypassed altogether.
2023
51% considered abandoning
37% followed through
2024
36% cited friction as a reason to abandon
18% followed through
2025
40% considered abandoning
25% followed through
Among high-income earners, that number jumps to 32%. Among 25 to 34-year-olds, it jumps to 45%.
When merchants lack identity signals at guest checkout, the cost is not just friction. Poor verification turns away legitimate customers. Every false decline is a lost sale, a damaged relationship, and a customer who may not return. Tools that accelerate checkout, passive identity verification, and behavioral analytics now allow merchants to recognize and assess fraud and identity risks without requiring login credentials or personally identifiable information.
For merchants, this means:
Using biometric and device intelligence to verify identity invisibly.
Leveraging behavioral signals to detect fraud in real time.
Offering post-purchase incentives to convert guests into loyal customers.
Consumers trust biometrics more than they trust passwords. Merchants are slow to catch up.
Of surveyed merchants, 50% report using secondary devices to verify identity, higher than any other vertical, while 35% are using behavioral signals, which is 15 percentage points above the cross-industry average of 25%. All merchant respondents plan to increase their fraud budgets, with the majority targeting 6% to 10% growth and 37% planning double-digit increases.
The generation most active online is the least aware of what's coming for them.
Despite being digital natives, 18- to 24-year-olds are the least aware of online scams and the most likely to say they have no concerns about fraud.
The threats consumers are most afraid of are the ones merchants can directly address.
68%
The top security concern for payment survey. Identity theft shapes how consumers approach checkout, trust new tech, and why in the single most important threat for merchants to treat first and mostly address.
61%
The second-highest concern and directly relevant to merchant checkout flows. This is addressable today through passive card verification tools that match payment card numbers to consumer identity attributes without requiring additional input from the buyer.
31%
The second-highest concern and directly relevant to merchant checkout flows. This is addressable today through passive card verification tools that match payment card numbers to consumer identity attributes without requiring additional input from the buyer.
The fraud budget is growing. The investment priorities need to catch up with the actual threat map.
Merchants are facing intensifying fraud threats and beginning to respond with sharper focus and smarter tools. Account takeover and transactional payment fraud are top concerns, with half of surveyed merchants reporting both as areas of increased stress and active investment for 2025.
Account takeover
Reported by 50% as a top stress area and active investment.
Transactional payment fraud
Tied with account takeover at 50%.
Secondary device verification
Used by 50% of merchants, more than any other vertical.
Merchants reported the highest rates of new account opening fraud of any category in the study, yet it ranks 15th on their active investment list for 2025. The gap between highest-reported problem and lowest-prioritized solution is the clearest misalignment in the merchant section. Protecting account creation does not have to be friction-heavy. Invisible, intelligent tools can secure the journey without slowing it down.
What the data is actually asking you to do.
1
They are the only category consistently on top. Consumers believe that their passwords are protected with them. Prioritize invisible verification, recognition-over-interrogation flows, and trust checkout. Consumers who feel recognized buy more, and they recommend loudly.
2
>When it comes to guest checkout, 43% of them when they already have an account. The answer is not to force account creation. The answer is frictionless verification. Guest checkout is not a bug in loyalty. It is an opportunity. It is a test of your technology stack.
3
Without identity signals at guest checkout, real customers get turned away. Passive verification closes this gap without delaying friction. The cost of underverification is not just fraud losses. It is lost revenue, damaged relationships, and customers who do not return.
4
They are the only category consistently on top. Consumers believe that their passwords are protected with them. Prioritize invisible verification, recognition-over-interrogation flows, and trust checkout. Consumers who feel recognized buy more, and they recommend loudly.
5
When it comes to guest checkout, 43% of them when they already have an account. The answer is not to force account creation. The answer is frictionless verification. Guest checkout is not a bug in loyalty. It is an opportunity. It is a test of your technology stack.
6
They are overexposed, underinformed, and your future customer base. Protecting them proactively builds the kind of loyalty that content any single transaction. Businesses that can protect and gain the trust of future consumers without increasing their reliance on personally identifiable information may win a significant payoff.